🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.